Village · 508 residents
Good · better than 4 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Cartmel scores 60/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for affordability (79) and safety (78).
It scores lowest on transport (31).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Cartmel in North West, each measured against the national average.
Cartmel is the kind of village where the pub sign and the priory tower do more talking than any shopfront could — stone cottages, a racecourse in the fields beyond, and a visitor trade that keeps the place looking cared for without tipping into anything glossy. You notice the age of the crowd before anything else: this is a place where the median resident is in their fifties, not their thirties, and the rhythm of the high street reflects that — considered, unhurried, closed early.
There's no railway station in the village itself, and the connectivity grade sits only around average, so if your work depends on a daily commute this is not the obvious base — you're buying into village life first and dealing with the drive second. Schools follow the same local, small-scale pattern: Cartmel CofE Primary is rated Good and takes barely fifty pupils, while Cartmel Priory CofE School covers the secondary years for the wider area. Neither is a big-city machine, and the Progress 8 figure at the Priory is slightly below the national zero-line — worth knowing, not worth panicking over. Housing follows the same story as the schools: small and particular. The dozen or so recent sales lean heavily towards detached freehold houses, and a "For Sale" board here is almost always advertising a family-sized stone house you own outright, not a leasehold flat — at a median price nearly double the wider Westmorland and Furness authority, this is one of the more expensive corners of that patch, though still short of the eye-watering end of the national market.
Green space is tight and local rather than sprawling — a handful of small plots rather than a country park — but the fells and Lake District edge are what people are really buying into, even if they don't show up as acreage on a spreadsheet. Health outcomes here score strongly against the national picture, and safety sits comfortably above the B+ average band, which makes the raw crime figure worth pausing on: violence and sexual offences make up over half of the (very small) annual count, and set against the parent authority's crime rate the local figure reads as sharply elevated in percentage terms. That's a function of a tiny population base rather than a lawless village — one or two incidents can swing a percentage wildly when there's barely two dozen residents on the books — but it's the one grade that doesn't match the calm, well-off, high-Ofsted picture around it, and it's worth sitting with rather than dismissing.
This suits someone who wants a slower, older, more settled community, who doesn't mind driving for the train and the supermarket, and who values a strong pub, a good church school, and fells on the doorstep over nightlife or a fast commute. It's a harder sell if you need frequent rail access or a lively peer group in your own age bracket — the demographic here has already mostly finished that chapter of life.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.