Neighbourhood · 58 residents
Good · better than 4 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Carshalton on the Hill scores 58/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for schools (76) and safety (71).
It scores lowest on food & drink (30).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Carshalton on the Hill in London, each measured against the national average.
Carshalton on the Hill reads as semi-detached London suburbia at its most settled — broad roads, 1930s bay fronts, hedges rather than walls, the kind of streets where the cars on the drive tend to be a few years old rather than new. It doesn't feel dense for inner London, though the numbers say otherwise; this is a place that looks calmer than its population density would suggest.
The practical picture here is a strong one. Carshalton Beeches station gives you the rail link, and with a median age of nearly 43 this isn't a hotspot for twenty-something commuters so much as a landing place for people a bit further into settled life — households who've traded a faster commute for a bigger house and a quieter street. Schools reinforce that: Stanley Park Infants and Oaks Park High School both carry Good ratings, part of a schools picture that scores strongly overall, even though Oaks Park's progress scores suggest it's not where the top academic numbers come from. The housing stock matches the demographic — mostly freehold semi-detacheds, over three-quarters of sales freehold, with a median price around £630,000 that sits close to the regional London average but well above the national one. A semi here sells for roughly £705,000 against a national median of £273,000, which tells you this is a borough where even the "ordinary" house carries a city price tag. Against Sutton, the wider borough, prices run about 38% higher, so you're paying a premium even within what's already an expensive part of London.
Green space is modest rather than generous — ten spaces totalling under ten hectares, proportionally thinner than the national average per head, so this isn't a place built around sprawling parkland, more pocket greens and gardens. Day to day, the picture is one of comfortable domesticity: good broadband (full fibre past three-quarters of homes), decent connectivity grades, and an environment grade that holds up well. Health outcomes score strongly too. Crime is where you have to pay attention: violence and sexual offences account for over a quarter of all incidents, with shoplifting and anti-social behaviour close behind — and yet the overall safety grade sits at the very top of the scale, and the crime rate runs markedly below the Sutton borough average. That's the one grade worth sitting with: an area that otherwise reads as uniformly comfortable, with a safety score to match, sitting on a crime mix where violent offences are still the single largest category. Worth knowing, not worth panicking over — the trend here is flat, not worsening.
This suits people who want London reach without London's rawest edges — a family with school-age children, a couple who've outgrown a flat and want a garden, someone who values space and predictability over nightlife. It's less suited to younger renters chasing walkable bars and late buses, or anyone pricing strictly against the national market rather than London's. The trade-off is plain enough: you pay a premium for calm, and the calm mostly holds.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.