Village · 271 residents
Very good · better than 8 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Part of an official built-up area
Carlton scores 72/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as very good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (82) and transport (74).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Carlton in East of England, each measured against the national average.
Carlton is the kind of place you drive through rather than to — a scatter of detached houses along quiet lanes, with a population so small it barely registers on a map, and a median age north of fifty-seven telling you most of the people who live here have been here a while and aren't in a hurry to leave.
The practical picture is thin but coherent. There's one school in the immediate cluster, Kelsale Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary, a modest village primary with 159 pupils rather than a big feeder school, and no Ofsted rating attached to judge it by. Two transport stops serve the area rather than a station, so this isn't a commuter village in the conventional sense — it's somewhere you live if your working life doesn't depend on a daily train into Ipswich or Norwich. Housing here leans detached and freehold, almost entirely so, which is the classic shape of a settled, older, rural property market rather than one churning over with first-time buyers or new-builds — there were none in the recent sample. At a median of £355,000, it sits noticeably above both the national and regional medians, and a full 25.7% above the East Suffolk average, so a "for sale" board on a Carlton lane is pointing at something pricier than the district norm, not a bargain corner of Suffolk.
Green space is limited in raw terms — four small plots totalling under two hectares — but with so few residents that still goes a long way per head, and the overall environment grade sits comfortably above average. There's no named restaurant or pub in the picture here, so it would be misleading to sketch a weekend food scene; what you can say is that day-to-day life will mean driving to a nearby town for most errands, shopping, and eating out. The safety grade is the standout: an A, well above the B-range that covers most other aspects of life here, and with only a single crime logged in the past twelve months, trending flat. That headline number is almost too small to build a story on, though the wider crime breakdown — weighted heavily toward violence and sexual offences as a share of a very low base — is a reminder that percentages on tiny populations swing hard and shouldn't be read as a pattern.
This is a village for people who've already decided they want quiet over convenience — older residents, established homeowners, people not counting on a rail platform or a buzzing high street. It would suit someone comfortable driving for schools, shops, and a proper night out, and untroubled by paying a premium over the district average to get space and stillness. It would suit less well anyone who wants young family infrastructure close at hand, or who's counting on public transport to get to work.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.