Village · 874 residents
Fair · among the lowest-scoring villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Butterwick scores 46/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for affordability (81).
It scores lowest on health (39).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Butterwick in East Midlands, each measured against the national average.
Butterwick sits low and quiet in the Lincolnshire-edge flatlands of Boston district, the kind of place where new-build closes outnumber terraces and a detached house with a drive is the default, not the aspiration. With barely a hundred people calling it home and a population density a fraction of the national average, this is a village in the strict sense — one school, a handful of bus stops, and fields doing the work that streets do elsewhere.
The numbers behind the houses tell a clear story: nearly seven in ten sales here are new build, freehold is overwhelmingly the norm, and a semi-detached at £210,000 or a detached at £250,000 both undercut the national medians for the same property types by a wide margin. Against Boston itself, prices still run about 16% higher, so Butterwick isn't the district's bargain corner — it's paying a small premium for space and newness. Council tax bands come in well under the national average too, which matters more here than in a city, given the median age is a generation older than the England norm at just over fifty-four. This reads as a settled, later-life village rather than a commuter dormitory — there's no rail station in the picture, and the single school (rated in the C+ band alongside connectivity) means anyone moving here with young children should look at options beyond the village itself rather than assume it's covered on the doorstep.
Green space is modest — three plots, under three hectares between them — so this isn't a village built around a park; the rhythm here is more about the surrounding countryside than a named recreation ground. Broadband is decent, with full fibre reaching most premises, which matters more day to day than it sounds when the nearest amenities are a drive rather than a stroll away. Safety is the quiet strength in the data: only three crimes recorded in the past year, safety graded B+, and the trend flat rather than worsening — a small place where an out-of-pattern violent-crime share in the breakdown looks more like a rounding effect of tiny numbers than a real pattern to worry about. Health and environment grades sit comfortably in the B band too, consistent with an unhurried, lower-density place to grow older in.
This suits someone past the school-run years, wanting a freehold new-build or a solid detached house, comfortable driving for shops, secondary schools and stations, and drawn to a place where the crime blotter is thin enough to read in full. It suits it less well if you need a walkable high street, a choice of schools, or a station platform in view of the front door.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.