Village · 596 residents
Good · better than 4 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Burnham Market scores 62/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for health (85) and safety (80).
It scores lowest on transport (31).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Burnham Market in East of England, each measured against the national average.
Burnham Market's high street gives itself away quickly: flint-and-brick shopfronts, delis and galleries rather than chain stores, and cars with out-of-county plates parked outside them for the weekend. It's the kind of place that reads as a destination as much as a place people simply live — the sort of village where you notice the median age before anyone tells you the number, because the pace on the pavement says it already.
That pace shows up properly in the figures: a median age north of 58 against a national figure in the low 40s, and a population so small and thinly spread that it barely registers on a density chart. This isn't a commuter village in any meaningful sense — the transport grade sits at a C and there's no rail station drawing in London-facing buyers. Burnham Market Primary and Nursery School, rated Good, serves the families who are here, but this is a place people move to rather than one they pass through on the way to a job. Housing is heavily detached and entirely freehold in the recent sales sample, and at a median of £435,000 — well above both the King's Lynn and West Norfolk district figure and the national median — a "for sale" board here is selling space, garden, and a finished look rather than a fixer-upper. Detached homes alone are trading north of £500,000, comfortably ahead of the national detached average.
Green space is modest in scale — a handful of pockets totalling under four hectares — but it's not really parks that shape a weekend here; it's the coastline and the food. With a cluster of independent restaurants and delis rather than a high street of takeaways, Saturdays tend to mean a walk followed by a long lunch rather than a shopping trip. Healthcare and general wellbeing come through strongly in the local grading — an A+ for health — and safety follows the same pattern: a single crime recorded in the past year, an A grade, and a trend holding flat rather than drifting either way. The one place the picture breaks from that otherwise glowing pattern is connectivity — broadband coverage and mobile signal lag behind what you'd expect from the rest of the profile, a C+ that stands out precisely because everything around it is so much stronger.
Economically, this sits in a curious position: an income and deprivation decile of 3 — meaning many areas nationally are less deprived — sitting alongside house prices that outstrip both the region and the country. That gap tells its own story: a village where wealth visiting on weekends and wealth living here year-round aren't always the same wealth, and where the working-age economy is thin even as property values run high. It suits those who want quiet, coastal, food-led living and don't need to commute, who value low crime and slower streets over fast broadband and rail links. It would ask real questions of anyone needing a fast connection to a city, a large school catchment, or the everyday infrastructure of a bigger town.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.