Town · 1,324 residents
Excellent · better than 9 in 10 towns
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Burford scores 88/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as excellent — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for food & drink (83) and safety (82).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Burford in South East, each measured against the national average.
The high street here is honey-coloured stone and antique shop windows, the kind of place where the cars parked outside are as likely to be Land Rovers as anything else, and where the crowd on the pavement leans grey-haired rather than young. This is a village with a median age approaching 56, nearly a generation older than the national average, and it shows in the pace of the place — measured, unhurried, more interested in a good lunch than a late night out.
There's no railway station listed for the village itself, so this isn't a commuter's first stop — you'd be driving or bussing to a connection rather than walking onto a platform, and the dozen bus stops scattered around point to a place built around cars and country lanes rather than season tickets. Schooling, though, is a genuine draw: Burford Primary School carries a Good rating, and Burford School — the secondary, a large academy with over 1,400 pupils — gives older children a clear onward path without leaving the village. On the property side, the story is Cotswold stone rather than new-build brick: freehold terraces and detached houses dominate, there's effectively no new-build stock, and the median sale price sits well into the 500s, comfortably above both the regional and national medians and about 35% higher than the West Oxfordshire average it sits within. A "for sale" board here is selling permanence and period character, not a starter home.
Green space is generous for a settlement this size — thirteen separate plots covering nearly 56 hectares, a ratio that dwarfs the regional norm — and that abundance shapes the rhythm of free time: dog walks, garden visits, the sort of unhurried outdoor life that doesn't need a calendar entry. Health provision reads strongly too, and the village's overall character grade sits at the top of the national scale, which tallies with what you'd sense walking round: this is a comfortable, well-kept place. The one note that doesn't quite fit the pattern is crime — burglary and violent/sexual offences between them account for over half of the (admittedly small) annual case count, a reminder that even a village graded highly for safety on paper isn't crime-free in practice; with numbers this low, a handful of incidents can swing the percentages sharply, so it's worth reading the rate rather than panicking at any single category.
This suits people who've already done the commuting years and want out of them — retirees, established professionals working from home, families anchored by the secondary school rather than passing through on a train line. It's less suited to anyone who needs a fast, frequent rail link into a city, or a first-time buyer hoping for something modest and new. The trade-off is plain enough: you're paying a premium, in money and in distance from a station, for stone walls, quiet lanes, and a school run that ends in the village rather than beginning a longer journey.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.