Neighbourhood · 16,667 residents
Fair · among the lowest-scoring suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — electoral ward boundary, used as the nearest surveyed shape
Brimsdown scores 45/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
No topic reaches "very good" (70+); its best is schools (66).
It scores lowest on affordability (32).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Brimsdown in London, each measured against the national average.
Brimsdown reads as industrial-edge London before it reads as residential: terraced streets packed tight against the Lea Valley's warehouses and yards, the kind of place where a postwar workforce settled and their descendants, plus a steadily newer mix of families, have stayed on. The population skews young for the capital, and the density here is actually lower than the London average, which tells you this isn't tower-block territory — it's two-up two-down terraces, close together, cars parked nose to tail.
The practical picture is mixed in a way worth sitting with. Brimsdown Rail Station puts you on the line without a drive, and with fourteen local transport stops threaded through, getting around without a car is realistic — the transport grade here is solid. Schools fare reasonably too: Brimsdown Primary and Alma Primary are both rated Good, and Oasis Academy Hadley takes you through to secondary age locally, so a family settling here isn't short of options even if an Outstanding-rated school isn't the one down the road. Housing is where the maths gets interesting — terraced houses dominate sales, most of it freehold, and at a median around £420,000 that's actually below both the Enfield borough figure and the price a similar terrace fetches regionally, while sitting well above the national terrace price. You're paying London-adjacent money for an outer-borough terrace, in other words, and the market's barely moved in the past year — flat is flat, not falling.
Green space is the honest weak point: there's essentially one formal plot of significant size, nothing like the leafy spread you'd get further out in the borough, so weekend life here leans on getting in the car or on the train rather than wandering a local park. That scarcity sits oddly against an otherwise decent environment grade — the area isn't unpleasant, it's just short on the kind of green lung that makes a Saturday easy. The crime picture is the sharper flag: violence and anti-social behaviour together account for over half of recorded incidents, and the overall crime rate runs well above the Enfield borough average, not just the national one. That's the one grade that breaks the pattern here — safety sits respectably on the area's own scorecard, but the underlying numbers tell a rawer story, and it's worth weighing against the health grade, which also lags noticeably behind how well the area otherwise scores.
This suits someone who wants a practical, unglamorous foothold in London — decent transport, workable schools, a mortgage that doesn't require regional wealth — and who isn't leaning on the area to provide parks, nightlife, or a particularly settled feel. It's a place to live efficiently rather than to retire into; what you save on the house price, you may spend in vigilance about which streets you're on after dark.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.