Village · 647 residents
Fair · better than 1 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Brigham scores 53/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for affordability (84) and safety (75).
It scores lowest on transport (31).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Brigham in North West, each measured against the national average.
Brigham reads as a scattering of houses rather than a settlement in the usual sense — barely over a hundred people, detached houses on freehold plots, and none of the density that makes most of the North West feel urban. This is the countryside version of the region: the kind of place where a "For Sale" board means a genuine wait for the next one to appear.
The numbers back up that impression of scale. A population density nowhere near the national average means space is the default here, not a luxury, and the median age of nearly 45 tells you this isn't a village filling up with young families chasing school catchments — it's settled, older, established. Property here is almost entirely detached houses on freehold tenure, and at a median sale price around £210,000, Brigham actually undercuts the national figure by some distance, sitting low against even the regional norm for detached homes specifically — a three-bed detached in Cumbria costs noticeably less than the same house further south or in a city fringe. Income and deprivation deciles put it solidly in the "less disadvantaged" half of the country, without being anywhere near the sharp-elbowed affluence of the home counties.
Where it gets more interesting is safety, and this is worth sitting with rather than skating past. The overall grade pattern is strong — B+ across the board on environment, housing, nightlife, safety — but the crime rate compared to the surrounding Cumberland authority is startling on paper, showing as vastly higher than the parent area's benchmark. Look closer and the story softens considerably: this is a village of just over a hundred people, so a total of three recorded incidents in the past year is enough to swing a rate calculation wildly, and violence and sexual offences dominate the tiny sample. It's a lesson in how percentages behave at small scale, not a warning sign about the street itself.
Schooling is thin on paper but not absent — St Bridget's CofE School and Broughton Primary School both serve the area, neither carrying a published Ofsted rating in this data, which simply means you'd want to ask around locally rather than lean on a headline grade. Broadband is decent for a rural spot, with fibre reaching a solid majority of premises, which matters more out here than it does in a city where fallback options are everywhere. Green space is present but modest in scale — two plots, well under a hectare between them — so this isn't a walking-trails destination in its own right; you'd be driving out to Cumbria's wider landscape for that, which most people who choose to live here already expect to do.
This is a place for people who've already decided they want quiet, space, and a slower rhythm over convenience — retirees, established households, anyone who finds a hundred neighbours a feature rather than a limitation. It will frustrate anyone wanting nightlife, transport choice or a buzzing high street; there's none of that on offer, and the connectivity and transport grades reflect a spot that assumes you own a car. What it does offer is affordability relative to the wider market, freehold security, and a crime picture that, once you look past the raw percentage, is about as sleepy as the setting suggests.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.