Suburb · 496 residents
Fair · among the lowest-scoring suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Bowlacre scores 46/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for affordability (71) and infrastructure (70).
It scores lowest on health (24) and food & drink (37).
Safety isn't scored here: street-level police data for the area is incomplete, so the overall score leaves it out.
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Bowlacre in North West, each measured against the national average.
Bowlacre is streets of semi-detached houses, gardens front and back, cars on the drive rather than the kerb — the kind of place that reads as settled rather than transitional. There's no high street buzz here to speak of, and that seems to suit the people who live on these roads: a median age pushing 47 tells you this isn't a place cycling through young professionals every couple of years, it's a place people stay.
The housing stock backs that up. Freehold semis dominate the sales here — sixteen of the last twenty-four sales, against a scattering of detached and terraced — and a For Sale board on this street is overwhelmingly likely to say "three-bed semi, own it outright." Prices sit a little above the wider Tameside borough, around 36% higher than the district median, though still comfortably below the national figure and roughly average for the North West. On schools, the picture is more mixed than the rest of the profile: the one sample secondary, Alder Community High School, is rated Requires Improvement with a negative Progress 8 score, which is the one grade in this file that doesn't match the surrounding pattern of B's — worth checking against other local options before you commit if schooling is a priority. Public transport is thin on the ground, just a couple of stops locally, so this reads as a driving suburb rather than a commuter-rail one.
Green space is present but not abundant — the area sits a touch below both regional and national norms for hectares per head — and there isn't a standout food or leisure scene woven into the data here; this is a place you drive out from for your Saturday rather than one built around a parade of restaurants. What the numbers do flatter is safety and connectivity: full fibre reaches over 90% of the area, and the broad grade pattern — B's and B+'s across affordability, connectivity, environment, transport — points to a quietly comfortable, unremarkable-in-a-good-way suburb. The crime comparison against Tameside looks alarming on paper, but with only two recorded incidents in twelve months against a very small population base, that percentage swing is more a quirk of small numbers than a lived reality; the flip side is there's too little crime data here to read a trend either way.
This suits someone who wants a quiet, established, car-dependent suburb with decent broadband and reasonable value against the wider region, and who is willing to look past the local secondary school's current form. It's less suited to anyone wanting rail commuting, nightlife on the doorstep, or a highly rated school already sorted for them.
Safety isn’t scored here: street-level police data for the area is incomplete, so the overall score leaves it out.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.