Neighbourhood · 9,768 residents
Good · better than 6 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — electoral ward boundary, used as the nearest surveyed shape
Bounds Green scores 61/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for schools (79) and health (70).
It scores lowest on affordability (21).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Bounds Green in London, each measured against the national average.
Bounds Green reads as terraces and low-rise flats packed tightly along the A406 corridor, with the kind of density that tells you this is inner London in all but postcode snobbery — more people per hectare here than almost anywhere in the country, let alone the capital's own average. It's not a place that performs for visitors; there's no obvious high-street spectacle, just the steady traffic of people getting on with commuting, schooling, and shopping locally.
That density buys you serious transport reach: Bounds Green Underground Station anchors the area, backed up by Bowes Park and Alexandra Palace rail stations, so you're covered whether you want the Piccadilly line into the West End or National Rail out towards Moorgate. Schools are the other pillar here, and this is where Bounds Green quietly overperforms — Rhodes Avenue Primary and Bounds Green Infant School are both Outstanding, and Alexandra Park School carries the same rating through to GCSE with a strongly positive progress score. With a median age of 37.5, this isn't a retirement pocket or a graduate crash-pad — it's family and working-commuter territory, the sort of place where an Outstanding primary within reach of a tube station matters more than a trendy café count. Housing here is dominated by leasehold flats, with terraces making up the next biggest slice and freeholds a genuine minority — a For Sale board on most streets here is advertising a lease, not a garden. Prices sit a little below the borough of Haringey overall, itself no cheap corner of London, and well above the national median — this is affordable only in a relative, London-shaped sense, which is precisely why the affordability grade lags everything else here.
Green space is modest rather than absent — 13 patches totalling under 17 hectares won't overwhelm you, but they're there for a Sunday walk rather than a picnic-all-day plan. The area's broader profile is solidly above the national average on health, environment and connectivity, painting a picture of a place that functions well day to day even without a signature park or restaurant strip to its name. The one note that doesn't quite fit the pattern is safety: crime here runs over a third higher than the Haringey average, with violence and anti-social behaviour together accounting for more than half of all recorded incidents — a genuine outlier against the generally comfortable B-range grades everywhere else, and worth sitting with rather than skating past.
Put together, this suits someone who wants strong transport links and genuinely good schools more than they want a quiet crime sheet or a garden of their own — a commuter or a family prioritising the school gates over the picture postcard, comfortable with paying a premium for a leasehold flat in exchange for the Piccadilly line at one end of the street and an Outstanding primary at the other.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.