Town · 22,168 residents
Fair · better than 1 in 10 towns
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Bishop Auckland scores 53/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for affordability (86) and environment (77).
It scores lowest on safety (35).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Bishop Auckland in North East, each measured against the national average.
Bishop Auckland's terraces run in long Victorian rows down towards the market place, the kind of streetscape where a For Sale board means a two-up two-down freehold rather than a new-build cul-de-sac, and where the buyers tend to be people who already know the town rather than people discovering it. It's a place built for the price of a house, not the promise of one — and that shows in almost everything else about how it lives.
Start with the money, because it explains the rest. The median house price sits at £122,000 against a national figure closer to £281,000, and even against County Durham itself Bishop Auckland comes in slightly cheaper. That affordability is real — council tax, rent, the lot, all below the regional norm — but it sits alongside an income decile of 2, which tells you low prices reflect low local earnings as much as any bargain. Terraced houses dominate the sales here, nearly all freehold, and the type-by-type numbers make the gap plain: a local terrace sells for a third of the national terrace price. This is a market for people who live here for reasons other than resale value. Trains run from Bishop Auckland station, and the town has its own secondary options — Bishop Barrington Academy and St John's Catholic School among them — though the schools grade overall sits just below average nationally, with progress scores that suggest secondary attainment is a genuine weak point rather than a rounding error.
The grade pattern is where the honest picture lives. Health, affordability and transport all read strongly — this is a well-connected, cheap-to-live-in town with decent bus and rail coverage for its size — and green space is generous relative to the population, with over fifty sites and 52 hectares to wander through. But safety is the outlier, marked distinctly lower than everything around it. Crime is running well above the County Durham rate, driven mostly by violence and anti-social behaviour rather than burglary or vehicle crime, which matters for how a place actually feels day to day: it's less "lock your car" and more "town centre can get rowdy at closing time." Housing trend is improving, and the safety trend is described as flat rather than worsening, so this isn't a spiral — it's a steady, known quantity, not a story of decline.
Who ends up here tends to be people who value having somewhere solid and inexpensive to put down roots, within reach of Durham and Darlington, with the market place, the park space, and the schools all within the town itself rather than requiring a drive to reach them. It suits people who've weighed the affordability against the safety grade and decided the trade-off is one they can live with — retirees, established local families, first-time buyers priced out elsewhere. It's a harder sell for anyone whose main filter is safety statistics or who needs a school with strong secondary results as a non-negotiable. The town isn't pretending to be something it's not: it's affordable, it's connected, and it asks you to accept its rougher edges as the cost of that.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.