Village · 571 residents
Good · better than 5 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Beyton scores 64/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (93) and transport (74).
It scores lowest on food & drink (29) and infrastructure (33).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Beyton in East of England, each measured against the national average.
Beyton reads as a scatter of detached houses along quiet lanes, the kind of place where you notice a tractor before you notice traffic. There's no high street bustle to speak of here — this is a small Suffolk village, barely a hundred people in the immediate patch the data covers, and it carries itself accordingly: settled, unhurried, populated by people who've been there some time rather than people passing through.
The numbers back up that impression of settledness. A median age over fifty says this isn't a village filled with young families chasing a starter home; it's a place people move to once, then stay. Housing here means detached houses bought outright freehold — the only sales on record fit that pattern exactly — and a median sale price around £450,000 sits well above both the Mid Suffolk district figure and the national median, roughly in the upper quartile of prices seen anywhere in the country. That buys space and quiet, not proximity to a station platform or a run of restaurants; connectivity and nightlife both score toward the middle of the pack nationally, which is the honest trade-off for the peace.
Safety is where Beyton quietly separates itself from the crowd — the grade sits at the very top of the national scale, and with just a handful of incidents logged in a year, that isn't a statistical fluke so much as a reflection of how few people and how little footfall there is to generate trouble in the first place. Green space is modest in absolute terms — a handful of small plots rather than sprawling parkland — but with so few residents to share it, it doesn't need to be large to feel sufficient. Schools score comfortably above the national Ofsted average, which matters more here than the absence of shops or a big night out; anyone weighing this village up is doing so on the strength of the school run and the safety of the lanes, not the dining options. Health provision reads as solidly ordinary rather than a selling point either way.
This suits someone who has already decided that space, quiet and a low crime rate outweigh convenience — an older buyer downsizing from a bigger house but not a smaller garden, or someone working from home who doesn't need a station in their evening plans. It would suit less well anyone who wants a walkable social life or a fast broadband connection as standard, since full-fibre coverage here still only reaches a little over half of properties. The regret, if there is one, would come from expecting village amenity where there's really only village calm.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.