Belmont Road in North West has a Check Local Score of 49/100 (fair), drawn from official data on safety, schools, transport, housing, amenities and the local environment, each measured against the national average — a score of 60 is typical for the country.
Belmont Road is terraced streets, end to end — brick bay windows, short front yards, the odd corner shop still doing business between them. It's a dense, tightly packed pocket of Liverpool, and it looks it: more people per square kilometre than almost anywhere in the region, which gives the streets a lived-in, overlooked-by-neighbours feel rather than any sense of space.
Money is the plain fact here before anything else. This sits in the most deprived decile nationally on both income and general deprivation measures, and the terraced houses that make up most of the sales here trade at a fraction of the national terraced price — a median house price under six figures where the England-wide figure runs several times higher. Against Liverpool itself, the borough it belongs to, homes here are cheaper still, which tells you this isn't just "affordable Liverpool" but affordable even by the city's own standards. A for sale board on this street is almost always advertising a freehold terrace, sold outright rather than leasehold, to someone buying at the cheap end of the market rather than downsizing into it. The schools available — St Michael's Catholic Primary, rated Good, alongside a small handful of others — serve a population whose median age, at 36.5, skews younger than the national average, suggesting families and younger households rather than retirees. What the area doesn't have is much rail infrastructure to speak of, so this reads as a bus-and-foot suburb rather than a commuter-belt one.
Green space is thin on the ground — a handful of small plots totalling under three hectares, well below what you'd find in most English suburbs — so daily life here isn't built around parks. The picture on safety is the one that needs saying plainly: crime runs nearly three times the rate of the surrounding borough, with violent and sexual offences making up the largest single share by some distance, followed by drug offences and public order incidents. That's the out-of-pattern grade against an otherwise unremarkable B-range profile on connectivity, health, and housing — this isn't a place that's struggling on every front, but safety is the one area where it clearly lags its own city, let alone the national picture.
Broadband is a genuine strength — full-fibre coverage above 84% is well ahead of what many far wealthier areas manage — and connectivity and health scores sit respectably in the B range. What you get, in sum, is a working-class, densely built inner-city pocket where housing costs are genuinely low, digital infrastructure is unexpectedly good, and the trade-off is a level of recorded crime that anyone moving here should weigh with open eyes rather than filed away as background noise. It suits people who've already priced in that trade-off and are buying for affordability and connectivity over green space or a quiet crime record — not a verdict, just the shape of the deal on the table.
Data last updated: 15 August 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.