Village · 314 residents
Fair · better than 1 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Ashmore Green scores 52/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (81).
It scores lowest on health (22) and food & drink (25).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Ashmore Green in South East, each measured against the national average.
Detached houses set well back from the road, gravel drives, hedgerows rather than fences — Ashmore Green reads as a village built for people who've already done well and want quiet rather than convenience. There's no high street to speak of here, and that's rather the point.
The numbers back up the impression. This is decile 9 for deprivation and decile 10 for income — about as comfortable as England gets — and the property market confirms it: six recent sales, split between detached and semi-detached, every single one freehold, with a median price of £765,000 against a national figure of £281,000. That's not a typo you need to double-check twice; West Berkshire itself sits at £385,000, so Ashmore Green is pricier even than its own wealthy parent authority. A board outside one of these houses is telling you this is a place to arrive at once you're established, not a first rung. Schooling is a mixed picture to describe precisely, since the sample here is thin, but Downe House is a name that carries weight regionally as a well-regarded independent school, and Curridge Primary offers a small community-school alternative for younger children. Commuting is the honest trade-off: there are two transport stops logged for the village and nothing resembling a rail station in the picture, so this reads as car-dependent rather than train-friendly — fine if you work from home or don't mind a drive to catch a train elsewhere, less fine if you were hoping to walk to a platform.
Green space is generously provided regionally, and with a population of under 150 packed into a low-density setting, you're never fighting for elbow room on a walk. There's no named restaurant cluster or food venue in the data, which fits the character rather than contradicts it — this isn't a place you go to eat out, it's a place you drive out from. The nightlife grade sits at a modest C+, distinctly the odd one out against a run of B+ and A grades elsewhere, and that's worth sitting with for a second: everything about this village says comfortable and safe, except the acknowledgment that there's not much happening after dark. Safety itself is the standout, graded A, and holding flat over time — though it's worth reading the crime figures in proportion, since a small population means even a handful of incidents (thirty violent or sexual offence records, the largest single category) can look statistically dramatic against a tiny denominator without meaning the streets feel unsafe. Health is graded B, connectivity a solid B+ with full-fibre broadband reaching over three-quarters of properties, useful if you're working from home given the commuting picture.
This suits someone who has already built financial security and wants to spend it on space, quiet, and a large freehold rather than a lively social calendar or an easy commute. It's a poor fit if you need a station platform on your doorstep or want evening life within reach — you'd be trading that away for the hedgerows and the distance from everyone else.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.