Town · 5,933 residents
Good · better than 5 in 10 towns
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official settlement boundary (National Records of Scotland)
Alness scores 60/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for environment (78).
It scores lowest on transport (31) and food & drink (39).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Alness in Scotland, each measured against the national average.
Alness sits along the Cromarty Firth with the kind of low-rise, pebble-dashed streetscape you get in a working Highland village rather than a commuter dormitory — houses built for people who work locally, not for people who disappear south on a train each morning. It's not a place that performs for visitors; there's no polish to it, and that's rather the point.
The housing picture backs this up: a median price a little over £219,000, and a longer-term upward trend in values that's held steady rather than spiked, which suggests a settled market rather than one being chased by outside buyers. Council tax here runs close to the Scottish norm, so there's no premium being charged for the address. What you get instead is space — the population density is meaningfully lower than the Scotland-wide average, which is a roundabout way of saying gardens, not stacked flats. The median age, at 41.6, tracks almost exactly with the national figure, so this isn't a retirement village or a young professionals' enclave — it's a proper cross-section, families and older residents living side by side.
Green space is genuinely part of daily life rather than an afterthought: with 29 separate green spaces recorded for a village this size, there's room to walk a dog or let kids out without getting in a car, even if the total acreage is modest. The health grade here is the standout of the whole picture — an A, well clear of what you'd expect given the area's wider economic profile — which tells you this is a place where people are, on the whole, in decent shape, whatever else is going on around them. Safety sits comfortably too, graded in the same solid band as housing and environment, and the trend is flat rather than worsening, which in practice means nothing dramatic is shifting either way. The one grade that breaks the pattern is nightlife, marked down at C+ — no surprise in a village of this size, and not something to hold against it, but worth knowing if an evening out means more than the local pub.
The harder truth is economic: this is an area in the lower-middle band for income nationally, and toward the more deprived end on the wider deprivation measure, which doesn't show up in the streetscape but does shape what's realistically on offer in terms of local jobs and services. That's the trade-off Alness asks you to weigh against its space, its calm, and its genuinely strong health outcomes. It suits people who've made peace with a quieter economic pulse in exchange for room to breathe — not those looking for a springboard or a nightlife scene, but those who want a village that feels lived-in rather than curated, and isn't pretending to be anything else.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.